![]() isn't that just an advertisement? It should be removed from the article. Bests, Languageleon ( talk) 00:50, 23 October 2008 (UTC) Reply Īs much as any link to the Encyclopaedia Britannica you find on Wiki, so I'm sure if you want to remove one, you'll want to remove the other. Doktorspin ( talk) 05:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC) Reply I'm ambivalent about both (because they do provide useful resources) and if you include this particular link I don't think it should be inline. There are people who guard this page against free software and endorse commercial web sites and commercial products. They remove name of free software but retain promotional material. I just don't want to go into in an edit war so added a comment here. It is a free Ear training software which has been translated in 8 languages. My previous additions was removed instantly. ![]() Please read conversation above, WP:NOT, and WP:LINKS. You are actually inserting strong bias toward commercial products and against free products. So as any intelligent person would do you delete all the free useful external links from the article and leave the references to the commercial products. Before you complained about the commercial bias the mention of freeware was about even with commercial software until someone deleted all the external links and the references they had, you. The reason no new links are added is Aruffo deletes edits from anyone who tries to add links because he's retarded and thinks computer aided ear training must all be spam and not notable. We've already established if it has links from several edu sites we can call it notable. This comes from the butthurt he has from not being able to post his own website everywhere, which he's spammed in the perfect pitch section. He sells a nice little retarded software to teach perfect pitch even though he hasn't got perfect pitch. I call conflict of interest with aruffo and lack of disclose he's got competition to his product as part of his incentive. He's should not be able to edit this section. I was not aware that he has a conflict of interest with free or open source software. I believe he should be blocked for editing this article or section. Please read the massive discussion we had under the Promotional Links section, you have to collapse it. It's more than clear he's just against any links being there at all. ![]() I've added them back including your lenMus and IwasDoingAlright, which is one of the most recommended I've seen in forums of jazz. lenMus is under GNU so it shouldn't a problem. Sorry Nevit, I thought from the edit summary you were the one to remove all the external links but it was Aruffo. 75.53.40.237 ( talk) 22:36, 20 July 2009 (UTC) Reply Ĭritical assessment and a call to action I misclicked when checking, I should have known. The more I look at this article, the worse it appears. It's not just disorganized (although it is) it's completely devoid of context. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |